BPB GIVEAWAY: Dawesome Kult + Oblivium Alpha & Omega Expansion Packs (WINNERS ANNOUNCED)

574

Dawesome, HydraTek, and Spektralisk offer three FREE copies of the Dawesome Kult virtual instrument and a brand-new double expansion pack to one lucky BPB reader!

The expansion pack project is called Oblivium, and it’s divided into two individual packs: Oblivium Alpha and Oblivium Omega.

It’s a meticulous collection of handcrafted presets that explore dark synth tones. The patches result from a collaboration between two sound designers who combined their artistic influences and unique styles.

Originally inspired by the Doom soundtrack and designed for Dawesome’s epic Kult synthesizer, Oblivium features a dark dystopian vibe. It is perfect for any composer or music producer looking for aggressive, organic, and complex sounds.

The sound bank has a strong horror-movie influence, and you will definitely get some inspiration for a spooky cinematic soundtrack.

Each expansion pack features 75 expressive presets, deeply customizable for both traditional MIDI keyboards and MPE controllers. The patches offer a vast array of sonic variation and customization possibilities for each of the 150 included patches.

With a main focus on complex sequences and aggressive, abrasive basslines, Oblivium Alpha thrives in gritty cinematic scenarios. It works great for dark bass-oriented music genres, while its sibling Omega takes care of desolate soundscapes and apocalyptic drones. 

For those unfamiliar with Kult, it’s the latest innovative synthesizer from Dawesome.

Its uniqueness comes from its +30 complex oscillators, based on the mathematical chaos theory called Strange Attractors. 

While not the place to dive deeper into this fascinating subject, it’s enough to say that you must hear it to believe it.

Kult’s innovative sound shaping options allow for organic overtones, a paradise for west-coast buchla-style synthesis enthusiasts.

You can further shape the sound with intuitive FM and AM synthesis controls, which seamlessly interact with the natural, organic sources. 

The expanded filter section features a formant filter per voice, two comb filters that are driven by a distortion stage, and an analog filter with two coupled stages.

Featuring also an arpeggiator and a powerful but intuitive modulation system, the timbres possible with Kult are countless.

This is now your chance to get your hands on Oblivium, which offers a wide range of sonic textures to discover inside Kult.

More: Dawesome KultOblivium Alpha / Oblivium Omega

The Giveaway

Dawesome, HydraTek, and Spektralisk offer three FREE copies of Kult + Oblivium Alpha and Omega to one lucky BPB reader.

To enter the giveaway, answer the following question in the comments section below: Do you prefer using presets or programming your synth patches from scratch?

We will randomly select and announce the lucky winner on this page on Monday, September 25th.

Good luck, everyone, and thank you for reading Bedroom Producers Blog!

The lucky winners are:

  • Klaus
  • Dmitry
  • KalnzEB

Congratulations to our lucky winners (you will receive the prizes via email)! To everyone else, better luck next time – more giveaways are coming soon.

Share this article. ♥️

About Author

This article was written by two or more BPB staff members.

574 Comments

  1. I use presets mostly, but only because my own sound design skills aren’t as good as I’d like them to be yet. I’d love to achieve the level where I could sell presets myself.

  2. I program from scratch, but if there are certain sounds I can’t really replicate, I’ll open a preset and do reverse engineering to understand how they make the sounds.

  3. Love building my presets from scratch. Helps make my music more unique and I learn all about the synth in more depth, rather than just relying on the inbuilt presets.

    Good luck everyone in the competition! :-)

  4. Well even though I love sound sculpting and feel the need to be original but have to be honest and say that I prefer presets. I gets me inspired so quickly and keep it melodic from there.

  5. I prefer using presets if I had to pick. I like sound design, too, but when I’m in a songwriting mood, I’m not in a sound-designing mood and visa versa. Plus I like to treat presets as helpful band members: they contribute sounds I didn’t have in mind but changes the tracks for the better. It gets me out of the formulaic rut of dialing in the same patches and expands my understanding of options. Then I take what I learned and hone it when I’m back in sound-design mode.

  6. Q: Do you prefer using presets or programming your synth patches from scratch?
    A: Any way the wind blows doesn’t really matter to me, to me.

  7. In my case it’s always a combination of both. I usually start with a preset and prepare a demo of a song, and the further I go, the more I tweak the patches and create a couple of new ones when necessary. With millions of patches available, often created by top notch sound designers, it makes no sense not to try and adopt them in my music. Besides, deadlines often make you take a shortcut when possible so you can spare some time just in case you have to focus a bit longer on mixing and mastering.

  8. I prefer doing my patches from scratch. But I like preset browsing too because sometimes thy can show the full potential of a synth.

  9. I usually use presets and tweak them a bit, but depending on the context sometimes I prefer to make my own sounds from scratch

  10. I use every method available applicably. I use presets when I’m In the mood to make a beat fast, & get an Idea out more quickly. Then If I don’t like the sound/preset I will then use the secondary option which Is to tweak the preset to preference, liking etc.

    Lastly. The 3rd method, in no particular order to prior methods, would be to just create a preset from (INT) scratch. I tend to sound design my sounds when I want a more unique sound stylistically for certain vibe.

    Ultimately, (presets) teaches/shows you the inner workings structurally of what control features to be engaged for “sound design” is predicated upon theoretically..

    In turn “sound design”, & having a grasp, understanding of it allows you to then masterfully create presets. Which IS why I say I use all 3 methods, i.e preset, tweaked modified presets, & straight from (INT) scratch

    And I always start with the basics, essentials etc. Then I’ll try to get fancy with effects/modulation patterns lol..

  11. To be quite honest, I spent years trying to learn to make my own patches but honestly, I still love presets. Besides being great to study, they actually help me in writing music. I find a big issue with making my own for a project is often getting lost in said sound design rather than actual music writing aspect.

  12. Depends, if time is a factor then presets offer a great starting point so you can just get on with making music. If I have more time I like to create my own weird and wonderful presets, especially in synths like Vital, Serum & Alchemy. I don’t think people should be so hung up on whether to use presets or not; if it helps you to make great music then why should you care?

  13. Programming patches, saving them and being surprised by them later when trying in the context of another track. Some become recurring, like when you make a unique and effective bass patch.

  14. Usually I use presets as a starting point, but I’m slowly learning how to make patches from scratch, especially in Vital. Some synths have a “randomize” option which generate brand new sounds on the fly, and I find that fun, especially in Melda’s MSoundFactory which has allows you to adjust the randomization amount by ctrl+clicking or alt+clicking the “Random” button.

  15. Presets are a great starting point to see what the synth is capable of. There are some sound designers who can really create a work of art. And then you try to come up with something that is not a work of art but work in progress but that is fine. It is always learning from the best and trying to get better.

  16. I can do both depending on what the music is doing or needing. I do like to find a preset that I like the general vibe of then launch off into new tangents with it and see where that ends up.

  17. Jonathan Marchant

    on

    I like to use presets most of the time, but if I’m feeling froggy, I sometimes build one from scratch and save it for later.

  18. I like to be creative and do it myself. But sometimes presets are much more interesting than what I can come up with myself. In this case, I will select presets.

  19. a little of both for me. I’ll usually see what a synth can do by thumbing through presets, making tweaks along the way. Then I’ll often begin searching for the “init” patch or setting (sometimes for much longer than I’d like!). From there, I like to explore from scratch. When tweaking existing presets – they often sound so good these days, it can be pretty hard to make it sound anything but worse when tweaking existing presets IMO but all depends on the synth!

  20. Mostly use presets and edit them, only a few times have I found a preset fit so well that I barely touched it. More often it ends up sounding completely different, but the preset gives a good starting point.

  21. Presets define the sound I’m looking for, then slight adjustments can sometimes get it to a finished state, when I want to get really creative, I go for a preset that is not really suitable, then try to mould it using an arsenal of tools and effects… Experimenting can often bring totally new flavours to a once simple sound, which never fails to surprise my ears.

  22. I love finely crafted presets that I can tweak to my liking rather than start from scratch. I’m not big into sound design, I’m more of a plug’n’play kinda guy.

  23. Usually the presets sound cheesy and not fitting really into other takes so I tweak sounds with a lower octave I have freedom layering with different tops which can be more detuned. Also splitting different timbres on the piano scale which is fortunately not only possible with samplers.

  24. I like to find a preset, strip it of FX, tweak it and then later add my own effects. That’s the ideal way to get where I want to go

  25. I would prefer to program my own sounds but I really don’t know how to create sounds useful to my genre(s). So ultimately, I scroll through TONS of presets.

  26. I usually go through the presets when demoing a synth and then, if the synth stays in my toolkit, I try and ignore the presets and make my own until I have a good grasp of the instrument.

  27. I definitely use a combination of both presets and making my own sounds from scratch. There’s often a steep learning curve when figuring out what every parameter of a synth does and how they work together, so taking a preset and deconstructing it down to the simplest part, and then reversing all of that is a nice way for me to understand how the preset is built and how the synth works. And then I can tweak the preset or use similar elements when making a sound from scratch to make new sounds without feeling like I’m just flailing and turning knobs at random.

  28. I prefer watching a tutorial about all the features and that helps not getting stuck mid-way in a project. Either that or reading the manual is always an option

  29. From scratch for me, it’s just more satisfying. That being said, I do make the patches often a fair bit before I use them, and I tweak them for every song I make just a little, aside from sound designing the output a bunch as well.

  30. Krzysztof Szychowski

    on

    Hello

    It is dependent on what is being done. Some situations demand a new sound other situations can be a derivative of a preset. So, both is the answer.

    Thanks for the opportunity to win the plug-in.

  31. I like creating my own patches, but that’s more random exploration rather than designing a particular sound. When producing, I tend to use tweaked presets.

  32. I usually prefer presets so that I can get a feel of what else I can do with my track. Once I get a handle on the synth then I will create my own.

    Thanks

  33. Browsing presets is a great way to have a starting point for tweaking and sculpting the sound, of for finding inspiration, and discovering the instrument capabilities, even if you have a very specific sound in mind.

  34. Presets can be good for inspiration, but I never leave them unedited. I love sound design, about as much or even more than I love making music.

  35. I like to look at presets to see how sounds I like are programmed. After I understand how to get specific sounds, I prefer to make the presets myself.

  36. I personally find that it really depends on my creative process and what I aim to achieve. I see the merits in both approaches. Using presets is fantastic when I want to save time and have immediate access to a wide range of sounds. However, when I’m looking for complete creative control and the ability to craft one-of-a-kind, personalized sounds that can truly make a composition stand out, I enjoy programming synth patches from scratch. To me, the ideal approach often involves a combination of both techniques using presets as a starting point and then fine-tuning or layering them with custom elements to create a genuinely unique sonic palette.

  37. I prefer to made my own presets from scratch and I use them if I can.
    Of coruse I also like to use original presets or modify them – it all depends on what I am looking for.
    Making sounds is for me nice hobby – like making music.

  38. I’m relatively new to making electronic music, so I always start with a preset that matches the vibe of whatever song I’m working on. From there, I’ll modify it (usually with a bitcrusher or LFO, my favorite effects).

  39. I usually start with presets and then tweak them also. I actually find it quite hard to create whole sound in any synth from the scratch

  40. I start from scratch to check, using a few of my favorite settings, how the synthesizer sounds compared to others that I already know.

  41. I overwhelmingly prefer creating patches. Some days I’ll sit with one of my synths or plugins and just design sounds, with no goal other than the pleasure of creating something new. And those experiments often inspire new tracks, which demand more new patches. It’s a beautiful creative feedback loop.

  42. Combination of both. I understand synthesis and enjoy programming my own patches, but sometimes I just need something quickly. If I am familiar with the preset library, that can be the fastest way to get a patch I want; but if not, then it may be faster to just program a patch from scratch, depending on the synth. For FM stuff, I tend to use presets.

  43. Man, tough to say as it really depends on my mood and the synth and what I’m trying to achieve. I always feel slightly weird about using presets in a song (zero judgment of others doing this though!). Dawesome is becoming a top 10 dev in the past couple years. Epic style and ear for what sounds great!

  44. I prefer to program my synth patches from scratch, but whenever I have time, I try all the presets and save those which inspired me as favorites, either to use as is, or to dissect how they were done, or as a basis for a new patch.

  45. i prefer to use presets, but i always tweak them (and they end up sounding totally different and not like what I expected, but that’s the fun part of producing :)

  46. there are companies and designers who know this well and I will never create better sounds than them, which is why I prefer to use ready-made presets,

  47. I do a combination of both. I make presets from scratch, and use factory presets (mostly tweaking the parameters)

    Thanks for the chance!

  48. For the most time I listen to the overall sound of a synth and it’s presets to get an idea of what to create out of it and then I either pick a preset and experiment with it or I take the idea of my journey through the bank and start from scratch and try to get to the vibe I captured and try to create it.

    Good luck all!

  49. I think it’s best to start from a preset that suits your production and then modify it to your liking to give it the final touch.

  50. For architecturally complex/unusual plugins my standard MO would be to pick a preset that’s close to what I want and tweak to taste. Or, if there’s a randomise button, I’ll hit it until I get something I like, and tweak. Subtractive analogue-style patches are way more likely to be built from scratch.

  51. – Do you prefer using presets or programming your synth patches from scratch?

    – I prefer tweaking the presets. We can learn much by analyzing the included ones.
    I think it helps to understand the workings of the more complicated plugins.

    It would be awesome to animate the changes (sliders, knobs) – some interfaces can do that, but that can be very process-heavy and can increase latency.

  52. I prefer presets for a starting point, if I really know the synth, I will make adjustments, or occasionally start from scratch.

  53. Either starting from scratch or with my own patches I created earlier. It’s always good to know the intricacies of a patch, and there’s so much new and exciting stuff to explore about a synth when you set it all yourself

  54. Do you prefer using presets or programming your synth patches from scratch?

    Sometimes I prefer tweaking a preset and at other times I want to create my patches from scratch.

  55. Maurus Fernandes

    on

    Making your sounds from scratch can be fun and unique but I prefer presets. As presets let’s me get vibe of the melody more quickly as I can change through fast.

  56. When I was much newer to music production, I would exclusively use presets, but now using some knowledge that I have gained from learning synthesis, I like to experiment with synths to get the sound that I want. However, if I am a bit bored, I might use a preset.

Leave A Reply